YouTube’s Censorship: A Bias Against Liberal Views
In recent years, the platform YouTube has come under scrutiny for its aggressive censorship practices, particularly targeting comments that criticize bigotry and Bigots. This article will explore the nature of YouTube censorship, its implications for free speech, and the biases that may underlie these practices.
Introduction to YouTube’s Censorship Practices
The issue of YouTube censorship is not a new one. Critics argue that the platform is increasingly resorting to censorship of comments and content that challenge the current political leadership or express critical views. It is suggested that YouTube’s in-house AI algorithms play a significant role in this censorship, often refusing to accurately transcribe speech-to-text if the content is deemed critical of the current corrupt Democrat leadership.
Tactical Censorship and Market of Free Ideas
The nature of these censorship practices can be described as “on-the-fly” or “on-the-spot” censorship, as it occurs immediately and without a formal process. This approach has been dubbed a form of “bully-mobbing” and “cancel culture”, where criticisms of the powerful are swiftly censored or punished. Proponents of free speech argue that good ideas do not need to be crushed, while only bad ones do. This attitude reflects a stark contrast between the protection of the powerful and the suppression of the marginalized.
Personal Observations and Evidence
The author of this article, who goes by the pseudonym, has been studying these censorship practices for the past three years. Through personal observations and a series of experiments, they have gathered evidence that suggests bias against liberal content on YouTube. The author notes that while comments critical of the left often remain uncensored, those that defend liberal perspectives or criticize conservative narratives are frequently censored.
Background and Methodology
The author provides a detailed background of their methodology, highlighting their efforts to maintain an unbiased perspective. As a human and an autistic individual, they acknowledge potential biases but strive to remain as objective as possible. They note that their observations are skewed by their unique position, having experienced both conservative and liberal perspectives due to their independent nature.
Observations of Platform Behavior
Observations on Twitter and YouTube reveal different patterns of censorship. On Twitter, conservative views were often censored, while on YouTube, liberal perspectives faced greater scrutiny. The author observed that comment sections discussing anti-feminism and anti-abortion were often filled with supportive comments, while sections focusing on LGBTQ and disability rights were mixed but saw liberal defenses being censored. This trend suggests that the YouTube algorithms are becoming more aligned with the right, disproportionately censoring liberal content.
Impact on Free Speech and Bias
The broader implications of this censorship are significant. The author argues that this form of censorship is not just about personal attacks but about suppressing viewpoints that challenge the status quo. When even innocent comments are censored, it undermines the fundamental principle of free speech. This bias against liberal views raises concerns about the future of democratic discourse and the openness of digital platforms.
Conclusion and Future Research
The author concludes by emphasizing the importance of further research to confirm their observations. They note that while their experience aligns with current research, they remain open to being proven wrong. The ongoing censorship practices on YouTube are a cause for concern, and continued study is necessary to understand the full impact of these practices on the ecosystem of digital media.