Why People Dismiss My Support for Trump and Validate Facts Over Opinions
It is a fundamental principle that people are entitled to their own opinions. However, a critical discrepancy arises when it comes to facts. While opinions can differ based on personal beliefs and experiences, it is entirely inappropriate to fabricate or repeat lies and expect others to accept them as valid.
Opinions vs. Facts
The assertion that one is entitled to their own facts is a misnomer, as facts are objective and verifiable. Individuals who attempt to promulgate falsehoods and force others to accept them severely undermine the integrity of discourse. It's imperative to challenge and disprove such misinformation rather than succumb to it.
One can look at the example of supporting figures like Adolf Hitler or Joseph Stalin. Supporting these individuals not only reflects poorly on the individual in question but also perpetuates harmful ideologies. Trump, in many respects, is seen as a modern-day embodiment of such harmful beliefs, including racism, violence against women, fraudulent behavior, greed, and avarice.
Public Perception and Judgment Based on Opinions
Support for something negative or malicious does not just reflect on the individual; it also affects how others perceive and judge them. For instance, supporting Trump is often equated with aligning oneself with these negative traits. This can be seen as a significant indication of one's character and values.
It is less forgivable to support a figure who is a "low-effort con artist" like Donald Trump. While some people take him seriously due to his media coverage and the echo chamber effect, his actions and promises often fall short of expectations. His rhetoric and promises, such as building a border wall with Mexico, are often exaggerated or simply not true when examined critically.
Why Stallions Scams Remain Invalid
Another example of why people dismiss certain opinions is the concept of the "Nigerian prince" scam. Like Trump, such scams often exploit human naivety and willingness to believe in improbable scenarios. The fact that the wall Trump promised to build did not materialize highlights his lack of follow-through and reliability.
Thus, when someone is a Trump supporter, it is reasonable for others to assume that this person's trustworthiness and reliability are questionable. This is not about silencing opinions but about evaluating them based on evidence and factual outcomes.
It is crucial to differentiate between opinions and facts. Engaging in fact-checking and demanding verifiable evidence for claims is essential for maintaining a fair and informed society.
When opinions are rooted in falsehoods, they can lead to dangerous and destructive actions. The storming of the U.S. Capitol on January 6, 2021, is a stark example of how malicious opinions, unchecked and acted upon, can have severe and life-altering consequences. This event underscored the importance of prioritizing facts and critical thinking over blind adherence to unsupported assertions.