Understanding Dual Rulership: A Comparative Study of Eastern and Western Astrology
In traditional astrology, planets were assigned rulership over two zodiac signs based on specific schemes. This article explores the concept of dual rulership and contrasts it with contemporary Eastern and Western astrological practices.
Introduction to Dual Rulership
The topic of dual rulership in astrology has been a subject of much debate and discussion. In the olden days, planets were given rulership over two signs based on two polarity schemes: Masculine/Feminine and Diurnal/Nocturnal. This assignment was not merely about an active presence but about a deeper sense of belonging within a sign. This article aims to clarify the distinction between traditional dual rulership and its relevance to modern astrological practices.
Dual Rulership and Modern Astrology
The concept of dual rulership is closely tied to the traditional astrological models. In these models, signs are ruled by planets based on specific attributes such as cardinal, fixed, and mutable signs, as well as their elemental qualities (fire, earth, air, and water). However, using the solar referent as a basis for rulership is not consistent with the original scheme.
Traditional astrologers do not believe that signs change their rulers based on the Sun's position. The true rulerships have remained consistent over time, rooted in the visual symbolism of the seven planets and the qualities of the signs. Planets like Uranus, Neptune, and Pluto, though often referred to as planets, are not considered full-fledged rulers in traditional astrological contexts due to their nature and movement.
The Dual Rulership Model: A Comparative Analysis
The dual rulership model is both complex and nuanced. In traditional astrology, each planet is assigned rulership over two signs. This system is seen in the original model, where each sign is ruled by a single planet. In contrast, the modern model often presents each sign with a unique ruler, reflecting an evolution in astrological thought.
Many astrologers, including those who have extensively studied aspects, use both models. The original model presents a more structured and traditional approach, while the modern model reflects a greater emphasis on personal freedom and choice. The latter is often found in more contemporary astrological systems, particularly in Western astrology, where self-determination and individuality are emphasized.
The Primacy of the Rulership Model in Astrology
The rulership model is critical in astrology. It forms the basis of many modern astrological techniques, such as horoscope interpretation and aspect analysis. Understanding the importance of this model helps in differentiating between various astrological systems, even when they share the same zodiac framework.
Western astrology often incorporates the concept of dual rulership, while Eastern astrology may focus more on the individual rulership of signs. For instance, in Vedic (or Jyotish) astrology, there is a clear emphasis on the unique rulership of signs, which can affect interpretations differently compared to the dual rulership system.
Impact of Modern Society on Astrological Practices
The evolution of human society has significant implications for the way astrology is practiced. In a modern, more self-determined society, a more modern astrological interpretation is often used. Here, the individual is understood not just in terms of the external environment but also in terms of personal choice and free will.
On the other hand, in societies with a more restrictive environment, the archaic astrological system may be more appropriate. This system is more about understanding the individual within the context of the broader societal forces. For example, a Saturn-restricted solar system would be more focused on how external circumstances shape a person's life, making it more relevant for someone under 30 years old or someone who is not fully in control of their choices.
Conclusion
The concept of dual rulership, while rooted in ancient traditions, continues to evolve and influence modern astrological practices. Understanding the nuances of this concept can provide valuable insights into both Western and Eastern astrological systems. By recognizing the primacy of the rulership model and the impact of societal evolution on astrological practices, astrologers can better align their interpretations with the cultural and environmental contexts in which they operate.