Has the Left Become Dogmatic and Intolerant of Internal Difference of Opinion? What Can be Done to Fix It?
It needs an injection of libertarianism, similar to the permissive progressivism of the 1970s, to bring back the spirit of a permissive society.
Have We Become Dogmatic and Critical of Internal Difference?
Claims that the left has become dogmatic and intolerant are often exaggerated. Internecine squabbles and feuds have been a persistent feature of the left since the Committee of Public Safety and the guillotining of Danton in the late 18th century. Trotsky's ill-fated dispute in Russia, Monty Python’s satirical jab at “splitters,” and other historical conflicts highlight the tendency of the left to fragment over theoretical and ideological disagreements.
However, it's worth noting that such conflicts are not unique to the left. The far right has also witnessed significant infighting, such as the Night of the Long Knives in Nazi Germany. The left, on the other hand, has not engaged in similar ideological purges, and there have been no instances of accidentally causing significant political ruptures within the party.
Analysis of Ideological Deviation
On the far left, there is often a deep devotion to ideology where any deviation is rejected. This is particularly evident in Marxist groups, where theoretical purity is paramount. The left’s reliance on theory as the sole basis for political action can lead to fragmentation, much like the religious condemnation of heresy.
It's not about having principles but about how these principles are adhered to. General principles are one thing, but prescribing specific methods and priorities by a text or authority figure can stifle internal debate and collaboration. The right, generally, shows more comradely towards each other, viewing ideological differences as less of a barrier to working together.
Principles and Policies for Inclusion
The left should focus on principles and policies that are designed for everyone, ensuring that no one is labeled a monster for their inherent traits. In the current US political climate, this means moving away from targeting groups defined by their race, gender, or sexual orientation (e.g., white males, heterosexual individuals) as victims or enemies.
There is a irony in observing that some hard right pundits display more camaraderie among themselves than their nominally socialist counterparts. This observation underscores the need for the left to re-evaluate its approach to internal disagreements and ideological purity.
The Current State of Politics and Ideological Entrenchment
The state of politics and the associated polarization in the U.S. have led to ideological entrenchment. The core of the left regulates its ideology, and critics, even from within the party, are often viewed with skepticism. Liberal figures like Elizabeth Warren, Tulsi Gabbard, Jeff Merkley, and Bernie Sanders are vying for influence within the party platform, while leadership from Chuck Schumer and Tom Perez advocate for more mainstream policies.
The solution lies in broader input from all party members. This has been partially addressed, evidenced by the increasing influence of grassroots movements and debates that cut across traditional boundaries. Encouraging more open dialogue and allowing multiple voices to shape the party’s platform can bridge the ideological gap and foster a more inclusive and collaborative environment.
By embracing a more permissive approach and recognizing the diversity of thought within the left, it is possible to address the issues of dogmatism and promote a more unified and effective political movement.