Donald Trump through the Lens of Shakespeare: Caliban or King Lear?
With the popularity of comparing political figures to Shakespearean characters, one question has sparked curiosity and debate: Does Donald Trump most closely resemble King Lear or the monstrous Caliban from The Tempest? Let's delve into the comparison, considering the potential parallels and interpretations.
Parallel to King Lear
As suggested by some, King Lear presents an interesting parallel to the political journey of Donald Trump. Lear, who divides his kingdom among his daughters, ultimately faces a tragic downfall as his kingdom is dismantled and his legitimacy as a leader is questioned by his family members, particularly his daughter Cordelia. This resemblance might suggest that, like Lear, Donald Trump’s presidency has faced significant challenges and a potential end with a similar narrative of redemption or downfall.
To delve deeper, one can consider the question: Will Trump seek redemption at the end of his journey, similar to King Lear? The role of Barron in Trump's family could potentially mirror Cordelia in Lear's. Cordelia's integrity and bravery highlight her devotion to truth and principles, which contrasts with the more questionable decisions and actions seen by Barron. This raises the question of whether Barron could symbolize a voice of reason or moral authority in the family, similar to Cordelia in Shakespeare's play.
Comparing Trump to Caliban
A friend recently prompted me to respond to a question on which Shakespearean figure Donald Trump most closely resembles. After careful consideration, I believe the Shakespearean character that Donald Trump most closely resembles is Caliban from The Tempest. Caliban is a monster figure, described as monstrous, fat, ugly, and stupid. He harbors absurd notions and is often embroiled in pointless and misguided schemes, much like Donald Trump's past actions and policies.
The Tempest Act I, Scene 2 includes a notable exchange where Caliban expresses his gratitude to Prospero for teaching him language, saying ‘You taught me language, and my profit on’t Is, I know how to curse. The rest I know not. This line perfectly captures the essence of Trump’s campaign style and public statements, where he often uses curse words and impolite language to express his dissatisfaction and frustration.
Furthermore, Caliban’s lust for Miranda, one of Prospero’s daughters, can be seen as an analogy for Trump's pursuit of women, particularly the idea of impregnating someone. This parallel can be drawn from Trump’s infatuation with sexualizing and objectifying prominent women, a behavior that has been a subject of criticism and controversy.
Caliban vs. Falstaff: A Comparative Analysis
Contrasting with the theory that Falstaff would emulate Trump, Falstaff is more complex and sympathetic than Caliban. While Falstaff is a rogue, he is depicted as clever, articulate, and even wise in his own way. His charm and wit often make him endearing to the audience, unlike Caliban who is more revolting and objectionable. Falstaff's character is richer, and while he can be disrespectful and crude, he never stoops to the level of Caliban’s mindless and destructive behavior.
However, there are moments in Trump’s public discourse that evoke a sense of Falstaffian behavior. For instance, Trump’s tendency to insult opponents with colorful language and harsh, unfiltered statements can be reminiscent of Falstaff’s abusive and derogatory language. But Falstaff, despite his flaws, remains more relatable and human compared to the overwhelming disgust and malice often attributed to Caliban.
Final Thoughts
The parallels between Donald Trump and Shakespearean characters offer a unique lens through which to view his actions, decisions, and legacy. While some may draw comparisons to King Lear, suggesting a narrative of redemption or downfall, others see a more literal and ominous parallel with Caliban. Ultimately, these comparisons highlight the multifaceted nature of political figures and their impact on society.
The potential for regarding Trump with sympathy seems unlikely due to the historical and cultural context surrounding his actions and demeanor. Trump’s behavior and rhetoric often provoke strong reactions, and while some may find moments of human connection, the broader narrative tends to reflect more negatively on his character and leadership style.