Consent in Classic Fairy Tales: The Case of Snow White and Sleeping Beauty
As of my last knowledge update in August 2023, discussions and debates have surrounded classic fairy tales like Snow White and Sleeping Beauty. The question arises: should these timeless characters be canceled or altered because the kisses they receive from their princes contradict contemporary ideas of consent and agency?
Debating the Characters' Consent
Some argue that the characters in these stories cannot be bothered with consent because, in their storylines, the characters already seem to agree to the kisses. Critics point out that the kisses were gentle and non-sexual, but these arguments fail to address the broader issue of agency and consent.
For instance, someone might say, 'Saying that the princes shouldn't revive the princesses with a true love’s kiss is like saying you shouldn’t revive a drowning victim with CPR. It’s ridiculous and stupid.' This argument, while logical from a survival standpoint, does not negate the broader issues of consent and ethical responsibility.
Tastes Change and Modern Interpretations
It is important to recognize that tastes and societal norms evolve over time. Modern adaptations of fairy tales, such as those by Disney, often rework the original stories to align with contemporary values. This shift is driven by various factors, including audience reception, financial viability, and artistic intent.
Disney, for example, has evolved its heroines to exhibit greater independence and agency. In the case of Snow White, she is criticized for being passive and weak by today's standards. Modern Disney stories often reflect the changing societal norms and expectations, and as a result, they may not be as universally beloved as their predecessors.
Understanding the Ethical Context
The primary objection raised by critics is the lack of consent on the part of the male characters. The kisses in Snow White and Sleeping Beauty are seen as a form of non-consensual sexual action. This perspective draws a parallel to the same ethical issues of consent in other contexts, such as rape or sexual assault.
The analogy of a paramedic performing CPR without consent is a valid comparison. Just as a paramedic is not expected to wait until a person regains consciousness before performing necessary life-saving actions, a prince is not expected to wait until a sleeping princess consents to a kiss, especially if the princess's life is at stake.
While the paramedic analogy is a helpful frame, it is essential to remember that the ethical context of consent in fairy tales is broader and more complex. The readers and audiences of these stories are not in the same situation as the characters, and thus we must critically evaluate the broader implications of the narratives.
If someone cannot distinguish fiction from reality and bases actions such as rape on fairy tale premises, that person requires serious intervention, but banning the story is not the solution. Instead, education and understanding are key.
Conclusion: While discussions about consent in classic fairy tales are valid and important, blanket eliminations or alterations are not always necessary. Understanding the context and purpose of these stories can provide a more nuanced perspective on their role in culture and their relevance today.