What If Australia and Canada Were Superpowers?
Questions often arise about what the world might look like if different nations had shaped the global order. The United States may be the prime candidate for such speculation, but what if Australia and Canada had become superpowers instead? This article explores the potential ramifications of a world dominated by these two nations and the lessons we can learn from such scenarios.
The Current Global Order
The world we know today is the result of many factors, including two world wars in the first half of the last century. Since then, there has been a long period of relative peace. But the idea that all wars are US wars is misguided and harmful. The truth is, the world's stability and peace have been the result of a combination of factors, including the efforts of multiple nations, including Australia and Canada.
A United Nations Vision
Many people believe that the United Nations was established with the hope of promoting global peace and cooperation. The UN has undoubtedly played a crucial role in mediating conflicts and fostering international collaboration. If Australia and Canada had indeed become superpowers, their influence on the UN and global governance would have been different but no less important. More good guys, more resources, and more ideas working together would have led to a more stable and equitable world.
Nations and Shortcomings
No nation is perfect, and Australia and Canada are no exception. Every country has its share of challenges and shortcomings. However, it is important to recognize the contributions of these nations to global peace and stability. The idea of a perfect country is a myth—it is impossible for any nation to be flawless. The United States, for example, has faced its fair share of challenges and has not always been the perfect superpower some may imagine.
Lessons for a Weaker America
If we consider the scenario where the United States is not a superpower, several lessons can be drawn:
Less Aggressive: A weaker US might focus more on diplomacy and negotiations rather than military intervention.
Less Bombastic: The nation might adopt a more restrained and less inflammatory rhetoric in international relations.
More Compassionate: A more empathetic approach to social and economic issues could lead to a more equitable society.
More Sympathetic: The US might be more willing to admit and rectify past errors, fostering a more constructive and forward-looking approach.
Understanding Beyond Money: Recognizing the value of human well-being beyond mere monetary gains could lead to more holistic policies.
Conclusion
The world is a complex web of nations and influences. Australia and Canada, despite their limitations, have contributed to global stability and peace. The US, too, could learn valuable lessons from a weaker, more empathetic, and more understanding approach to international relations. While the idea of a perfect nation is unrealistic, striving for a more compassionate, understanding, and cooperative global order is not only possible but necessary for the future of our world.